Useful assistance.
Photographer controlled.

No. AI may suggest, organise and accelerate repetitive work. The photographer reviews culling, sequencing, tagging, gallery design and client-facing actions before they affect the finished work.

• Suggestions should remain editable.
• Important actions should be reversible.
• No client contact should occur without approval.

Where useful, PhotoGram should show what was suggested, the evidence or activity behind it, what remains unchanged and how the photographer can approve, alter or reject the result.

Private work should not be repurposed for unrelated model training, public marketing or other secondary uses without appropriate authority and clearly documented terms. Production policies must state actual processing and retention practices.

Processing should be proportionate to the feature’s purpose, restricted to the intended workspace and retained only as long as documented product and legal requirements permit.

AI can bring likely duplicates, focus concerns and promising frames forward. It should not silently delete photographs or publish a final selection; the photographer remains responsible for the story.

A guest provides a reference image to locate relevant photographs within an enabled gallery. The photographer controls whether the feature is available, and access, disclosure, retention and audience settings should be clear.

PhotoGram may surface useful opportunities from deadlines, proposal activity or gallery engagement. The source context should remain visible, and the photographer decides whether and how to act.

Features should be assessed for usefulness, privacy, bias, misuse, false confidence and failure recovery across relevant photography contexts. Real customer evidence and incidents should guide ongoing improvement.